Resuming U.S. Food Aid for North Korea is Best of Bad Options

Resuming U.S. Food Aid for North Korea is Best of Bad Options

Like many policy issues regarding North Korea, the U.S. has no good options regarding the question of whether or not to resume deliveries of food aid to the isolated country.

Last year's flooding and severe weather have combined with Pyongyang's perverse policies and rising world food prices to produce major shortfalls in food supplies in many parts of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). The United States used to be one of North Korea's major food donors until the deterioration in bilateral relations in 2008-2009 and the refusal by DPRK authorities to allow extensive monitoring of the aid flows as per an earlier agreement led to a suspension of U.S. food deliveries.

Experts and moralists may debate the relative merits of North Korea's request for the food assistance. But on balance, resuming U.S. food aid to North Korea may be warranted for political reasons in addition to the humanitarian arguments in its favor, as it could help establish the conditions needed to resume a painful but necessary dialogue with the North Korean government on a range of pressing subjects.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.