The U.S. Election Is a Choice Between Climate Action and Retreat

The U.S. Election Is a Choice Between Climate Action and Retreat
Staff watch a presidential debate between Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris and Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump, in Philadelphia, Penn., Sept. 10, 2024 (AP photo by Jacquelyn Martin).

When U.S. voters go to the polls in November to pick the country’s next president, they will also be choosing between two possible futures: one in which the U.S. tackles the climate crisis at home and is an active partner in multilateral efforts to do so abroad; the other in which the country retreats from global climate agreements and domestic environmental policies, and doubles down on the use of fossil fuels.

The first would represent a continuation and expansion of President Joe Biden’s agenda on climate change and energy policies, which Vice President Kamala Harris—the Democratic nominee—has adopted as her own. The second would be the agenda of former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, should he return to the White House.

A departure from current U.S. policies would have far-reaching global consequences, especially when a path toward net zero carbon emissions that avoids the worst projected climate scenarios is attainable and economically beneficial.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.