It’s Time to Change the Discussion Around Vaccine Skepticism

It’s Time to Change the Discussion Around Vaccine Skepticism
A woman wearing a mask walks past a neon sign reading, Vaccines, in London, U.K., Feb. 2, 2021 (AP photo by Alastair Grant).

Writing in the New York Times just before the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday, Jeneen Interlandi reminded Americans that many of the health “crises” we are accustomed to hearing about and worrying over are not as terrible as they are often made out to seem. In fact, she argued, the misperception of health risks can itself contribute to a downturn in both mental and physical health.

To be sure, there remain many global health issues. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists considers pandemics to be one of the four critical threats to humankind’s future survival, alongside nuclear weapons, artificial intelligence and climate change. And bacterial resistance to antibiotics was among the problems that topped the United Nations’ agenda this fall.

But global public health measured in life expectancy has never been higher, and it is expected to increase over the next five years despite geopolitical and environmental risks. This is because of international cooperation to improve health and eradicate deadly diseases, which has been one of the greatest achievements of global governance in the past century.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.