Party Divide on Use of Force Resurfaces in Iran Deal Debate

Party Divide on Use of Force Resurfaces in Iran Deal Debate
President Barack Obama speaks about the nuclear deal with Iran at American University, Washington, Aug. 5, 2015 (AP photo by Carolyn Kaster).

Last week at American University, Barack Obama gave one of the most important foreign policy speeches of his presidency. In it, he laid out his detailed argument for supporting the Iran nuclear deal. The president offered a veritable legal brief on why the deal makes the most sense for U.S. national security interests, why it’s better than any alternative, why its critics are wrong and why the agreement builds on a “tradition of strong, principled diplomacy” in U.S. foreign policy.

But beyond that, Obama’s speech did something with even greater implications. It highlighted the widening dividing line between Democrats and Republicans on a much broader and more consequential national security issue: the use of military force.

Unfortunately, that message has been largely obscured by the dog-whistle nature of the American political debate over Iran, illustrated in this case by the now oft-heard charge that Obama was flirting with anti-Semitism in the address.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.