The Diplomatic Logic Behind the Comical U.N. Salisbury Debate

The Diplomatic Logic Behind the Comical U.N. Salisbury Debate
Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia holds up a copy of “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” as he speaks during a Security Council meeting, New York, April 5, 2018 (AP photo by Mary Altaffer).

If you wanted to see some quirky improvisational comedy in New York last week, the United Nations was the place to be.

On Thursday, Russia requested a public Security Council meeting to rebut charges that it was responsible for the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal in the British town of Salisbury. This was the second time that the council has discussed the attempted murder of the Russian double-agent and his daughter using a sophisticated nerve agent, Novichok.

Britain called the first of these meetings in March as part of a well-coordinated campaign to put Russia on the defensive, which also included appeals to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, or OPCW, as well as the European Union and NATO. The British Foreign Office may not be quite the diplomatic colossus it once was, but it still knows how to use multilateral organizations to get its message to the world.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.