Abu Muqawama: Reining in SOCOM’s Alarming Ambitions

Abu Muqawama: Reining in SOCOM’s Alarming Ambitions

In late-April, according to reporting by the New York Times, the U.S. Congress did something remarkable: It said no to U.S. Special Operations Command.

Asked by the command for new authorities to train security forces from Africa to the Middle East, a confused legislative branch, backed by the State Department and the rest of the U.S. military, denied the request. The request itself, though, reveals something of the ambitions harbored by the command. With its confidence boosted by operational successes and the esteem in which it is held, the command is marketing its units as the weapon of choice for U.S. policymakers trying to address America's varied national security challenges following the drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In last week's column, I wrote the first part in a series exploring why the "special operationalization" of U.S. foreign policy carries more risk than either operators or legislators fully realize. In this column, I will explain why the U.S. Congress -- and the White House -- needs to continue to stand firm against the expansion of U.S. special operations authorities and missions.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.