On March 2, the Bush administration announced the winner of the year-long competition to design the first new U.S. nuclear weapon in almost two decades. The stated objective of the upgrade is to create a new generation of nuclear warheads that are environmentally safer, more secure from accidental or unauthorized use, and easier to maintain, despite their longer lifespan, than the existing stockpile of U.S. warheads designed and built during the Cold War. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), selected a design submitted by the California-based Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Its proposal for the so-called Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) was based on a design previously detonated in underground tests during the 1980s, but never actually rotated into the stockpile. The new warhead would also include new safety features such as locking mechanisms and insensitive high explosives. The main competitor of the Livermore design came from the government's other premier nuclear weapons lab, Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, where the first atomic bombs were created. Although Livermore will assume the lead role in developing the final warhead design, its team intends to incorporate the superior technical features of the Los Alamos proposal.
Keep reading for free
Already a subscriber? Log in here .
Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
- Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
- Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
- The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.