Buyer Beware: The Pitfalls of an Economics-Driven U.S. Foreign Policy

Buyer Beware: The Pitfalls of an Economics-Driven U.S. Foreign Policy
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry addresses reporters about the Iran nuclear deal in the U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C., Sept. 9, 2015 (U.S. State Department photo).

The lingering misgivings among some in the U.S. Congress about the nuclear agreement with Iran have already generated calls for new sanctions against Iran, just as Tehran and many of its trading partners are gearing up for a post-sanctions environment, with corporate leaders booking flights to scope out prospects for trade and investment. Meanwhile sanctions against Russia for its seizure of Crimea continue to disrupt economic relations between Russia and major European countries, costing the latter tens of billions of euros in lost trade.

The widespread use of sanctions speaks to the more prominent role of economics in foreign policymaking, raising a broader question: Who wins and who loses when economics is used to achieve political ends?

Sanctions are only one form of economics as an instrument of international relations; initially they were used to freeze the assets of conquered nations, to ensure their safe return once sovereignty had been restored. But increasingly sanctions are a vital tool in the toolbox of statecraft, used more to punish than protect.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.