Clinton’s QDDR Not a Panacea for State

Clinton’s QDDR Not a Panacea for State

The Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR) announced by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on July 10 seems like a long overdue project for the State Department, which has lost ground in recent decades to the Department of Defense in steering U.S. foreign policy.

But although initiating a review is a valuable undertaking, some observers say it will likely produce underwhelming results -- for Clinton, for the State Department, and for U.S. foreign policy itself.

Clinton's plan is modeled on the Defense Department's Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). Mandated by Congress in 1996, the QDR is a study that outlines the national defense policy, and matches programs to resources. In her time on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Clinton said, the QDR was an "important tool for the Defense Department to not only exercise the discipline necessary to make the hard decisions to set forth the priorities, but provided a framework that was a very convincing one to those in the Congress." In the days before she announced State's new plan, Clinton was loudly praising the QDR around Foggy Bottom, sources say.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.