Earlier this month, the Pentagon issued a directive (.pdf) raising "irregular warfare" (IW) to the same level of importance as conventional battles. The December 2008 directive defines IW as operations to fight terrorists and insurgents, enhance the defense capacity of foreign governments, and promote stability in conflict-prone regions. It asserts that it is now Department of Defense policy "to recognize that IW is as strategically important as traditional warfare." Although the U.S. armed forces have long performed these tasks, most recently in Afghanistan and Iraq, the military has often done so only with great reluctance. The Pentagon developed considerable expertise in fighting guerrillas during the Vietnam War. When the U.S. military role in the conflict ended, however, senior commanders reverted to their longstanding focus on preparing to win major conventional wars in Europe and Asia. This neglect of low-intensity warfare has contributed to the difficulties the armed forces have experienced in Afghanistan and Iraq in converting initial battlefield victories into enduring political successes.
Keep reading for free
Already a subscriber? Log in here .
Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
- Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
- Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
- The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.