Guyana Political Crisis Result of Institutionalized Autocracy

Guyana Political Crisis Result of Institutionalized Autocracy
Guyana President Donald Rabindranauth Ramotar addresses the general debate of the 69th session of the U.N. General Assembly, New York, Sept. 26, 2014 (U.N. photo by Amanda Voisard).

Last month, Guyana was plunged into political crisis after President Donald Romator suspended parliament to avoid a no-confidence vote. In an email interview, George Danns, professor of sociology at the University of North Georgia, discussed Guyana’s domestic politics.

WPR: What is the background of the current political crisis in Guyana, and what impact is it having on the country’s economy and foreign relations?

George Danns: The 2011 elections in Guyana gave the combined opposition parties the Alliance For Change (AFC) and A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) a one-seat majority in Parliament over the governing People’s Progressive Party (PPP), which won the executive presidency. Prior to the 1980 constitution, the president was a largely ceremonial position, but that document essentially conferred ultimate power to the presidency. This cohabitation since 2011 between the executive and the opposition-run Parliament set the stage for the current political crisis and confrontation with President Donald Ramotar’s regime.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.