How the Dutch Election Curiously Became a Referendum on Trump

How the Dutch Election Curiously Became a Referendum on Trump
Geert Wilders during an interview, The Hague, Netherlands, Feb. 16, 2017 (AP photo by Peter Dejong).

When U.S. Republicans gathered to nominate Donald Trump as their presidential candidate at the party’s national convention last July, one of the many apocalyptic speeches they heard came from a man with a Dutch accent, bearing stark warnings from Europe: Geert Wilders, with his trademark bleached blonde bouffant, delivered a message that resonated with crowds accustomed to hearing Trump’s ominous worldview. “The situation in Europe today is worse than ever,” Wilders announced. “Europe, as a matter of fact, is collapsing, is imploding, is exploding. We have terror attacks by the Jihadis almost every week.”

Wilders, a member of the Dutch parliament, has built a career on warning about the grave dangers posed by Islam. That career now faces its most pivotal test. On March 15, Dutch voters will choose a new parliament, and Wilders’ Party for Freedom (PVV) could emerge with the most seats.

A victory by the unabashedly anti-Islam, anti-immigrant PVV would mark a stunning reversal for the Netherlands, one of the most liberal, tolerant countries in the world.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.