India Is Rising. Why Isn’t Its Olympics Medal Count?

India Is Rising. Why Isn’t Its Olympics Medal Count?
India's Olympic team during the opening ceremony for the 2016 Summer Olympics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Aug. 5, 2016 (AP photo by David J. Phillip).

Sometimes a game is just a game, but when it comes to the Olympics, many countries view sports as a metaphor for their standing in the world. The medal rankings constitute a black-and-white yardstick for national pride and, in some cases, much more. Even though the medals are won through the sweat, skill and power of individual athletes, a geopolitical subtext lurks beneath the medal counts. This year, the United States leads those standings by a mile; China is trying to keep up; and Russia, caught playing dirty, barely made it into the competition.

But what about India? Despite being a rising global power and the world’s second-most-populous nation, the country ranks dead last in all-time per-capita medals won at the Olympics. Nobody is quite sure why.

At the current Olympics in Rio, India looked like it might not score a single medal. Then on Wednesday, at long last, Sakshi Malik won a bronze medal in women’s wrestling. Earlier, the gymnast Dipa Karmakar had come agonizingly close, finishing fourth with a breathtaking performance that made her a national hero and won her plaudits around the world.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.