Is COP21 Climate Change Deal Multilateralism’s Swan Song?

Is COP21 Climate Change Deal Multilateralism’s Swan Song?
French President Francois Hollande, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius and United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the the United Nations conference on climate change, Le Bourget, France, Dec. 12, 2015 (AP photo by Francois Mori).

The climate change agreement hammered out at the COP21 conference in Paris this weekend inspires a cocktail of contradictory emotions: relief, cynicism, awe and melancholy. It is hard not to be relieved that world leaders have finally agreed on an ambitious agenda to limit global warming. It is equally difficult not to read their pledges with some skepticism.

While the Paris deal was bolder than many had predicted, aiming to stop global temperatures rising by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, many crucial parts of the deal are not legally binding. The package only has a chance of success if major economies stick to their pledges to curb carbon emissions. Even if they remain honest, scientists doubt that it will be enough to keep temperatures under control.

Supporters of the bargain have largely adopted a Churchillian argument. This is not the beginning of the end of the fight against climate change, but it may be the end of the beginning: There is now at least an agreed framework for cutting carbon emissions.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.