NATO’S Tepid Response to Russia is Europe’s Choice

NATO’S Tepid Response to Russia is Europe’s Choice

When all was said and done, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice got scant comfort from NATO on her mission to press punitive action against Russia following its armed incursion into Georgia -- and its slowness in leaving it. True, the North Atlantic alliance foreign ministers meeting in Brussels Tuesday did manage to adopt a united position -- but at the price of tepid language and of retaliatory steps that fell short of what the Bush administration had urged.

President Dmitry Medvedev signed an agreement that requires Russian troops to return to positions held before the fighting broke out on Aug. 7. There is little sign of Russian compliance on the ground, and in Brussels Rice pressed NATO members to at least threaten Russia with unspecified "consequences."

The Americans also called for a formal suspension of the NATO-Russia Council established in 2002 to increase cooperation on issues of defense, military and international security. For example, at a recent council meeting on June 13, the Russians had offered to contribute a navy vessel to the alliance's stop-and-search anti-terrorism operations on the high seas. A Russian submarine had also taken part in NATO search and rescue operations.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.