With the results of the first round of France's presidential election in, the conventional wisdom says the May 6 runoff between Gaullist Nicolas Sarkozy and Socialist Ségolène Royal will be decided on the merits of two distinct economic and social visions: Sarkozy's impatient laissez-faire reform vs. Royal's defense of France's traditional welfare state. But, trumping policy, the results of the election may actually be decided on the strengths of two very different political styles: the first, Sarkozy's, rooted in the political machinery of the past, and the other, Royal's, an as-yet untested strategy tailor-made for the current media age. The second round may provide the answer to an intriguing question: Is it possible to run a successful election in a modern democracy on the strength of direct, mass-culture appeal, and without being the uncontested leader of a political machine?
Keep reading for free
Already a subscriber? Log in here .
Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
- Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
- Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
- The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.