The Best Antidote to Russia’s U.N. Obstructionism Might Be China

The Best Antidote to Russia’s U.N. Obstructionism Might Be China
Russian Deputy U.N. Ambassador Vladimir Safronkov raises his hand to vote against a resolution condemning Syria’s use of chemical weapons, U.N. headquarters, New York, April 12, 2017 (AP photo by Bebeto Matthews).

It is Cold War time at the United Nations again. Last week, Russia caused diplomatic uproar by vetoing not one, but two Security Council resolutions extending a U.N. investigation into the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Moscow is angry with the investigators for accusing the Syrian regime of using sarin gas and chlorine bombs.

Russia has now used its veto 11 times to block resolutions over the Syrian war since 2011, four of them this year. Every veto sparks a ritualistic bout of outrage in the Security Council. All sides seemed especially tetchy last week. Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., claimed that her Russian counterpart was refusing to take her phone calls. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused Haley of “fake diplomacy.”

Journalists and diplomats alike characterized these exchanges as having a Cold War flavor. Moscow’s hard line is raising concerns about the future of Security Council diplomacy. Will Russia increasingly use its blocking power to paralyze the U.N.?

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.