The Growing Debate Over Development Aid Is Not All Trump’s Fault

The Growing Debate Over Development Aid Is Not All Trump’s Fault
President Donald Trump announcing the nomination of David Malpass, undersecretary of the Treasury for international affairs, to head the World Bank, in the Rosevelt Room of the White House, Washington, Feb. 6, 2019 (AP photo by Evan Vucci).

Can multilateral development institutions survive the era of Trump?

Last week, U.S. President Donald Trump nominated a new president of the World Bank, a post traditionally occupied by an American. Aid experts were worried, if not necessarily surprised, that the White House nominee—Treasury official David Malpass—has a history of criticizing bodies like the bank.

Commentators picked up on congressional testimony by Malpass from 2017, in which he supported the administration’s view “that globalism and multilateralism have gone too far,” and promised to limit or end U.S. support to underperforming aid institutions. He was more positive about the World Bank in further testimony to Congress last year, noting reforms that had been implemented. But aid experts still fear that his goal will be to rein in the bank’s projects and ensure they serve U.S. interests.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.