U.S. Voters Prefer Steady Hand to Tough Talk on Terrorism

U.S. Voters Prefer Steady Hand to Tough Talk on Terrorism
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton during a campaign rally, Seattle, Washington, March 22, 2016 (AP photo by Ted S. Warren).

With yet another European city touched by the scourge of jihadi terrorism, the focus of the U.S. presidential campaign quickly turned to the best way to protect America from the same threat. Not surprisingly, the responses of the Democratic and Republican frontrunners could not be more different.

Hillary Clinton warned that “terrorists seek to undermine the democratic values that are the foundation of our alliance and our way of life.” She sounded resolute in arguing that “they will never succeed.”

The response of Donald Trump, on the other hand, suggests that the terrorists already have. Calling the Brussels attack “just the beginning,” the GOP frontrunner quickly called for bringing back waterboarding and banning Muslim immigrants from entering the country, a move that Clinton said would not be “consistent with our values.” Not to be one-upped, Ted Cruz, Trump’s main remaining rival in the GOP contest, floated the idea of increased police patrols in American Muslim communities in response to the Brussels attack.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.