West Must Rethink Options Following Bosnia’s Elections

West Must Rethink Options Following Bosnia’s Elections

SARAJEVO, Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Bosnia's elections on Sunday offered little reason to expect any normalization for the divided country in the near future. The country's ethnic Serb entity re-elected leaders who have called for independence and denied genocide, while many Croats backed parties supporting further division along national lines. Despite a rise in support for moderate parties, these recalcitrant nationalists may impede the reforms envisaged by the international community to reverse several years of backsliding.

The electoral arrangements themselves offer insight into Bosnia's complex political arrangements, established by the 1995 Dayton Accords that ended the country's civil war.

The voting consisted of polls for a number of often-overlapping representative bodies and presidential offices. Voters chose members of the national parliament, those of the Federation (FBiH) -- the Bosniak and Croat entity -- and the Republika Srpska (RS) -- the Serb-dominated entity -- as well as the parliaments of the FBiH's 10 cantons. They also elected the members of the country's three-person national presidency -- one from each ethnic group -- and an entity president in the RS.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.