What Would a Truly Unconventional Foreign Policy Presidential Candidate Look Like?

What Would a Truly Unconventional Foreign Policy Presidential Candidate Look Like?
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders at a campaign rally at Penn State University, State College, Pa., April 19, 2016 (AP photo by Mary Altaffer).

In last week’s Democratic presidential debate, Sen. Bernie Sanders said something you don’t often hear in a U.S. presidential campaign. “We are going to have to treat the Palestinian people,” Sanders declared, “with respect and dignity.”

Though Sanders prefaced his statement by assuring Democrats that he is “100 percent pro-Israel,” the statement seemed like a breath of fresh air compared to the one-sided tone that usually characterizes campaign rhetoric on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Indeed, it was only four years ago that then-Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich suggested that Palestinians are an “invented” people, while collectively characterizing them as “terrorists.”

Indeed, the norm in presidential campaigns is for candidates to try and out-do each other in expressing their devotion to Israel’s security. In the same debate, for example, Hillary Clinton went to great lengths to decry terrorism by Gaza-based Hamas and offer support for Israel’s right to defend itself.

Keep reading for free

Already a subscriber? Log in here .

Get instant access to the rest of this article by creating a free account below. You'll also get access to three articles of your choice each month and our free newsletter:
Subscribe for an All-Access subscription to World Politics Review
  • Immediate and instant access to the full searchable library of tens of thousands of articles.
  • Daily articles with original analysis, written by leading topic experts, delivered to you every weekday.
  • The Daily Review email, with our take on the day’s most important news, the latest WPR analysis, what’s on our radar, and more.